Caring for the arrested fishermen to ensure the handling of the Japanese side road

Ming Pao News Agency

Members of the Hong Kong Fishing Action Committee demonstrated in the main entrance of the Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo and were arrested by the Japanese police. The incident has been 10 days. The two Hong Kong people involved in the case have been detained. How to deal with the Japanese side is not yet clear.The behavior of the two on the day did not actually endanger the property or personal safety of others, and the demonstration method was not fierce. It may not be possible to see a felony crime.Processing.The facts of the case are clear and clear, and there is no problem of unknown truth. The SAR government should seek central assistance to actively follow up the situation of the two people, understand the progress of the lawsuit, and ensure that the case is fair and fair as soon as possible, and the two will not be unreasonable.

Arsenal of the Yasukuni Shrine Demonstration- The Japanese side's test control must be combined

At about 6 am on December 12, two fishermen Guo Shaojie and Yan Minhua arrived at the main entrance of the Yasukuni Shrine. Guo Zhanxian did not Don't forget the Nanjing Massacre slogan, shouted slogans to protest, and burned the props with the name of the name of the A -level war criminal Tonjo. The main card of the gods, Yan Zeng was filmed. Someone stepped forward to stop, and the fire species instantly spread.Local media reported that afterwards, the Japanese police arrested Guo on the grounds of suspected invasion of private buildings, and Yan also entered the shrine to be arrested for no right reason.

In the past 10 days, Guo and Yan have been detained for investigation. Whether the Japanese party has been charged with the two, what is the specific charges, and whether the detention time will be extended, the news is quite chaotic.The two emphasized that the day was a peaceful demonstration, exercised the right to express freedom, and was guaranteed by the Japanese Constitution. However, local obligations lawyers said that if the prosecution believes that this is not a general protest, but arson in the surrounding area of the building.The SAR government has paid attention to the incident, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs also urged the Japanese side to properly handle the incident to ensure the legitimate rights and interests of the two. The Chinese Embassy in Japan has visited the parties and provided a list of translation services and lawyers.

Recently, many cross -border cases involved Hong Kong people or people holding Hong Kong passports. In contrast, two cases of fishermen's fishermen responded very cold.Some people have provoked officials in foreign countries. How the government follows up and follows up, depending on the nature, plot, and background of each case. It cannot be treated with dual standard differences because of specific treatment.If the evidence of illegal behavior is conclusive and the case is serious, the government cannot always protect short blind support and interfere with other countries' justice. However, if the case involved faces unreasonable and unreasonable prosecution, the government will actively follow up and safeguard the rights and interests of the parties.Taking the Meng Wanzhou incident as an example, although the US Department of Justice asked Canada to arrest on the grounds of violating the US sanctions and Iran's ban, people who know a little about international politics believe that the incident is essentially a China -US wrestling, and the lawsuit is just a guiseThe Financial Times also believes that Trump actually regards Meng Wanzhou as a hostage. As a bargaining chip of Sino -US trade negotiations, of course, the Chinese government cannot be unable to move.

Because it is unclear how the Japanese side intends to dispose of two fishermen at present, it is difficult to say whether the case will be infiltrated into the political elements at this stage, but the SAR government is still responsible for ensuring that they are fair and reasonable.The case of fishermen and the recent cases of drug poisoning in the Philippines have been charged with a case of poisoning in the Philippines. There is a key difference. The facts of the Tibetan poison case are still there. So far, there are still many controversy.The fishermen are arrested from demonstrations, and the truth is clear and clear.If the SAR government follows up the case of the Hong Kong people, it cannot be used to determine the judicial injustice of the Philippines by one side. There is no concern about the follow -up of the cases of fishermen.

The government must actively follow up the case Prevent Hong Kong people involved in the case

On the day, Guo and Yan's behavior only expressed political stance. It was neither burning a carburn to set up roadblocks, nor trying to occupy private places, and did not constitute serious hinders to the side, let alone pose a substantial threat to others' lives and property.Three years ago, the Koreans were dissatisfied with the Yasukuni Shrine's worship of the A -level war criminals, and placed a homemade bomb at the toilet grid near the public toilets near the shrine, causing the toilet grid and smallpox damage. LaterDestroy building and other charges and sentenced to 4 years in prison.In contrast, Guo burned demonstration props in the open space outside the shrine. He did not set fire to destroy the intention at all. He could not see the possibility of accidental injuries to innocent or damaging the shrine.If the Japanese side proposes a non -synergy prosecution, such as the arson of fire to endanger public safety, the SAR government should seek central assistance to negotiate with the Japanese side solemnly.

Japanese law stipulates that within 48 hours from the time of arrest, the police must decide whether to transfer the case to the prosecution. If it is decided to transfer it, the prosecutor will make a decision to prosecute within 20 days.The prosecution can apply to the court for a 10 -day detention period.In the past, some fishermen entered the Diaoyu Islands and were arrested by the Japanese side. Most of the Japanese government's approach was deported to the country on the grounds of illegal entry instead of sending them to the prosecutor.Demonstration, the situation is different, forced deportation may not work.The Japanese side handles this case. Whether the process is fair, the crime is compatible with the facts, and whether the severity meets the proportion, the SAR government and the central government need to pay close attention.It is also necessary to make the Japanese authorities understand that Hong Kong's response is not as quiet as the sea.

In view of the limited knowledge of Hong Kong people's progress in the progress of the case, the SAR government should assist the two arrested people with the Chinese Embassy in Japan to actively contact the Japanese side, understand the latest progress of the case, and what charges they will face.The SAR Government should urge the Japanese side to justice the case as soon as possible. If there is no sufficient illegal credentials, it should be released to avoid dragging or extending the detention period.