Hong Kong men published a post entitled "Not excluding the production of nitrate glycerin explosives bombing the PLA barracks" on the Internet, and was ruled by the court to incite others to create explosive products.

According to the Hong Kong Ming Daily, the defendant Chen Zhenming is 27 years old.Steps, suspected to incite others to create explosive products.The defendant was arrested on the morning of May 3, 2018, and was ruled to be guilty by the regional court on Thursday (September 29).

The prosecution said that the police also found that the defendant had published and responded to 19 stickers with abusive nature, showing that he had an anti -government stand and advocated violent intention.

The judge Zheng Jihang said that the defendant changed his mouth many times on the reason for the post involved in the case.The post is acting as an advertisement, and the statement is "repeated."Although the defendant explained that he had not woke up and his thoughts were chaotic, overall, the answer was that the head was the Tao and the preface was clear.

Zheng Jihang said that the defendant also argued in the court that he was a self -taught historian and loved Chinese culture.Published dissatisfaction, pay attention to its research results.The judge said that someone became a professional through self -study, but the defendant had only a middle six degree and had no professional group certification. He believed that he was only "self -expanding", but even so, it would not affect his criminal intention.

Zheng Jihang also said that the defendant claimed to read the literary science and the perception of "nitrate glycerin" was limited to the name, but in the video meeting, he pointed out that "nitrate glycerin" was an explosive, and the post title clearly showed the bombardment of the bombardment.The goal, the production materials, the amount and step of the step in the text, if he did not intend to incite, there is no need to list it at all. A series of behaviors show that he thinks about it.The post made explosives, and the prosecution ruled that the prosecution had no reasonable doubt.

Zheng Jihang said that the defense requested that the defendant would ask the defendant to report a psychological expert report. After the case was detained until October 14, the defendant had to be repaid.