Sun Xingjie: From the Huawei Incident, we saw that an enterprise entered the uninhabited area loneliness, and we also saw that China's powerful goals were not achieved by gongs and drums.

In early December, Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou was arrested while turning at the Canadian airport, and then triggered a series of discussions.It is undeniable that the Huawei incident is closely linked to the current Sino -US relations, especially when the 40th anniversary of China's reform and opening up and the 40th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and the United States are likely to become an important historical event.

For Ms. Meng Wanzhou, Huawei, and Sino -US relations, we all have reason to think or reflect on it carefully, as Mr. Ren Zhengfei, the founder of Huawei in previous years, Huawei has entered a uninhabited area, from chasing to surpassing, surpassing, and surpassing.Loneliness and crisis accompanied each other.As a thing itself, the Huawei incident requires more legal experts and technical experts to solve it, and at the level of Sino -US relations, it also needs a general discussion on the nature of things, but more importantly, the road of Huawei's future development and China to China must be.The future prospects of US relations have reflected.

One

Ms. Meng Wanzhou was detained and several hearing subsequent hearing, which caused heated discussion among Chinese and foreign media.Domestic public opinion, especially from the media, mobilized a round of patriotism.Ms. Meng has been released on bail. Whether she wants to extradite to the United States in the future will need a considerable process, especially the game in the legal field. I believe Huawei will find the best lawyer to win this legal battle.

Back to the incident itself, before December, the United States had issued an arrest warrant.The reason why the arrest of Meng Wanzhou mainly believes that Huawei is suspected of being suspected of exporting to Iran's prohibited products. Is this allegations reasonable?Of course, it may be unreasonable, but the United States has always been so domineering.After the US President Trump announced his withdrawal from the Iranian nuclear agreement, French oil giant Dadal withdrew in time.French President Macron firmly supports the Iran nuclear agreement, but he also admits that he is not the CEO of Da Dal, nor can he control the company's decision -making.It can also be seen from this example that unilateral sanctions in the United States can be domineering all over the world; from the perspective of corporate operations, it is also a wise choice to make the trend.

Huawei made a response as soon as possible, and was objective and calm.Huawei is a professional communications company. It has made a reasonable reaction to Meng Wanzhou's detaining incident. It is also very professional in public relations and communication.

The incident focused on the bail problem of Ms. Meng Wanzhou.After two debates, Meng Wanzhou finally obtained the bail right.The focus has also been transferred to Sino -Canadian relations.It can be said that the first victim of the Huawei incident was Sino -Canadian relations. From the discussion of online public opinion, China has a very limited understanding of this distant North American country.Canada is not a superpower, but it is also a member of the G7. It is an important part of the Western world. China ’s understanding of Canada also needs to be continuously deepened.

The focus of the future may be whether Ms. Meng Wanzhou wants to extradite to the United States.US President Trump said that if it is conducive to the interests of the United States, it will interfere with the incident, and in fact, it will also give this possible extradition case.

If the Huawei incident is about to stop at a company executive, then it will be fully prepared in the future. In addition to finding and believing in first -class lawyers, it also needs to be fully prepared on the Canadian and the extradition treaties of the United States and Canada.This is a great test for Huawei's legal department and senior decision makers.

Two

When the Sino -US dollar met, Ms. Meng Wanzhou was detained, which may be a coincidence, but it also caused widespread attention, especially in the moment when China -US relations are in a watershed.Many media believe that the essence of Meng Wanzhou's detention is because Huawei's 5G technology is already in a leading position. In order to prevent the development of Chinese communication technology, many people agree with this statement.

Whether Sino -US relations have shifted with the Huawei incident.If the answer is yes, those reasons can be explained in almost this reason to explain all events between China and the United States.Such ideas or concepts also make sense, especially at the time of friction and conflict between Sino -US relations.

First of all, the US National Security Strategy Report has defined the identity of China, that is, the strategic competitors of the United States, a revisionist country that challenges the US hegemonic position.Within a year after taking office, Trump issued a report, which also defined China and Sino -US relations.At least in Trump's first term, this view will not change fundamentally.

Secondly, from March this year, the United States' global trade war has become a trade war to China to a large extent. Of course, China and the United States have reached a major consensus.Go to the future development direction of Sino -US relations.Why the United States uses China as the primary goal of a trade war, and the reason for the shallow level is the trade imbalance between China and the United States.However, in the six months of the trade war, China and the United States' trade imbalances have not been improved. It also shows that the Sino -US trade structure is associated with the industrial structure of the two countries.EssenceThe deep problem is that the United States regards China as a country that may constitute a major geographical economic challenge to the United States in the future, and even surpass the United States in some areas.Trump said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal before the G20 Summit that after joining the WTO, China's economy rose rapidly.Trump has repeatedly emphasized that he will not be like the past few governments, because he believes that the past few government policies have failed to China.

In the end, the future competition between China and the United States is still the economic field. Furthermore is the competition of productivity, and the core is actually technology.What are the most creative organizations?Of course, it is an enterprise. Therefore, the technological competition between China and the United States will inevitably be manifested in enterprises.Trump believes that the development of Chinese companies is due to the transfer of compulsory technology and intellectual property theft.It is very difficult to change Trump's concept, and he is still in the era of national state governing the economy.

Sino -US relations are decoupled, and this time is decoupled by the United States.In the past forty years, China and the United States have had a lot of exchanges in the fields of goods, funds, technology and personnel. It can also be said that this is the four pillars of Sino -US relations.Just as the former US Treasury Secretary Paulson is worried, there are problems with these four pillars.The severe investment review of the trade war and the United States has greatly restricted the flow of goods and capital. The technical and personnel exchanges are facing increasing obstacles behind the Huawei incident.

What is the essence of Sino -US relations forty years?Economic exchanges and integration, but the differences between China and the United States in geopolitics and ideology have not narrowed, and the statement about the New Cold War between China and the United States is endless.There are indeed many signs of the New Cold War, such as the differences in ideology, the confrontation of geopolitics, nuclear weapons, etc., but the most important feature of Sino -US relations is the most important feature of the Cold War.There is a flexible diplomatic space, and it is difficult to form a base camp.

We see that the terms contained in the US -Mexico Agreement are indeed a sign of camp, and it is also the United States intentionally.The view of the market economy status may lead to the two parallel markets. Therefore, the problems of the organization and management of enterprises, especially the issues of ownership, have become more and more diplomatic.

Three

The United States' definition of Sino -US relations and measures are indeed at a turning point. The question is whether China also knows so much about Sino -US relations.Since 1949, China's diplomacy has a phaseThe autonomy is China's strategic choice with the United States, regardless of confrontation and friendship. China's reform and opening up is almost the same time as China and the United States' establishment of diplomatic relations. This is not a coincidence of history, but logical inevitable.

The United States regards China as a strategic competitor. So China believes that the United States is a strategic competitor or a partner?The answer to this question almost determines the future Sino -US relations.From the perspective of willingness or ability, China has no reason to enter a strategic competition with the United States.When Deng Xiaoping was nervous in Sino -US relations that year, he still thought that Sino -US relations would still be better.Is this judgment still applicable today?

Unlike Sino -US relations 40 years ago, Sino -US relations are the most important bilateral relations in the world at the moment.The nature, structure, and issues of Sino -US relations have undergone sharp changes. If a comprehensive analysis is not performed, I am afraid that it will fall into the vortex of passive response and fight against spiral rising.

The establishment of diplomatic relations between China and the United States is the geopolitical and diplomatic revolution in the Asia -Pacific region. It can be said that Sino -US relations are first established on the basis of strategic needs.Forty years later, the focus of Sino -US relations shifted from the government to the market and society. Under such a background, we are even more meaningful to examine the Huawei incident.In the future, Sino -US relations need to work hard in society and markets, because the strategic bonds of Sino -US relations are relaxing and even disappear.

The essence of China's reform and opening up lies in the transformation of the planned economy to the market economy, released individual energy, and created a large number of vibrant and competitive enterprises, including Huawei.If there is no reform and opening up, there will be no Huawei, let alone because the Huawei incident will influence Sino -US relations.

Enterprises are the cells of economic activities and the main body of innovation. The comprehensive strength of a country is increasingly reflected in the competitiveness of the enterprise.Huawei's success is the window of China's reform and opening up. At the same time, it has to sigh that there is only one Huawei in China.The technological innovation of enterprises will not only bring the market nature dividend, but also inevitably change the territory of the technology, which is associated with national security.It can be said that the competition of enterprises is not only economic competition, but also the meaning of strategic competition.

Enterprises are not only the subject of business and innovation, but also the main body of social relations.The social responsibility of multinational enterprises is also multinational, and it is inevitable to have relationships with local society. Furthermore, enterprises also need diplomatic capabilities. This is the view that Ren Zhengfei is explained in Huawei's public relations program.The future prospect of the enterprise not only depends on whether it can lead technological innovation, but also decides to resonate with the value and culture of the world's diversity.Is it constantly emphasizing your own characteristics, or to share values with local consumers, which is a difficult test for Huawei to go to world companies.

Huawei's success is not the result of unique technological innovation. It should be acknowledged that China has been on the way to catch up; Huawei's success is to openly absorb technology, and technology promotion and application can be successfully carried out through Huawei.Huawei's development itself is the epitome of globalization. Of its 92 major suppliers, 33 are American companies.It can be seen that the cooperation between enterprises has far exceeded the relationship between countries, which is also a microcosm of global order.

Huawei is currently in the difficult transformation from Chinese companies to world companies.Today's world order is undergoing sharp changes, and it has the head of protectionism and localism. However, the basic logic is still the fact that commercial exchange is unable to avoid.In the future global governance and national governance, enterprises will play an increasingly important role. We can assert that in the future, China's intervention and leading global governance are the most likely to be the company's cooperation with the forefront.Huawei is the leader of Chinese enterprises. Why didn't Huawei incident awaken the later companies in China?And if Huawei successfully responds to this crisis and avoids the trap, this experience will also be a precious wealth of Chinese companies.

The foundation of global governance is the coordination of great powers and governance of the great powers. The development of Sino -US relations itself is a key part of China's intervention in global governance, or even prerequisite.The development and guidance of Sino -US relations are part of China's national governance, especially the improvement of foreign strategic capabilities, and the only way to transcend various traps.

From the Huawei incident, we saw that an enterprise entered the uninhabited area loneliness, and the goal that China was going to the world's great powers was not possible to achieve gongs and drums.

(Note: This article only represents the author's personal point of view. Responsible for the mailbox [email protected])