New Yinye

In the past few days, a report entitled by this screen may change destiny, which has continued to swipe the screen on the Chinese network, which has caused heated discussions.

According to a report published in the Ice Point Weekly published by the China Youth Daily, the screen in the article refers to the live screen connecting the classrooms of the famous schools and the county middle school. It is said that it has increased the promotion rate of poverty -stricken areas.

It is reported that in the past 16 years, high schools in 248 poverty -stricken areas have passed live broadcasts, and have traveled to the No. 7 High School Seventh Middle School known as China in China. A total of 720,000 students have completed the course.Peking University Tsinghua.

Students in these poor areas have changed their destiny since then. The report described that for them, this screen is like playing light to the well and throwing off the rope. The people in the well see the sky and then crawl up desperately.

This report immediately detonated that public opinion is not difficult to understand. After all, inspirational stories that change fate can always be moved.In addition to the consent of the story of the fate of disadvantaged students, many people may also have some inner touch on the current status of their educational environment.

This also highlights that the problem of injustice is still the pain point of Chinese society. In this context, long -range teaching methods such as live broadcast make people see the possibility of education fairness and have certain positive significance.

On the one hand, live broadcast teaching helps to develop the field of vision of students, show them how broad the world outside the classroom is, how the learning and life of people of the same age is in order to inspire them to work up to realize their dreams.

On the other hand, live broadcast teaching should also benefit far teachers.Excellent teachers' resources can be shared through live broadcasts, transmitted to universities in more backward or remote areas from schools with better conditions. And this teaching model that has been sought after by capital in recent years has also been considered easy to promote. It is expected to improve the overall teaching of teachers.Level and efficiency.

However, such a teaching model also attracted a lot of doubts.Some people believe that remote teachers no longer prepare lessons and teachings, but are only responsible for playing videos, correction assignments, and management of classroom discipline. In fact, they have become assistant to teaching assistants, which may lead to the decline in the enthusiasm of some teachers.According to reports, some teachers felt that they were looking down on and even tearing books to protest.

Many people have criticized live broadcasts that are one -way teaching. The daily interaction and emotional exchanges between teachers and students have greatly reduced, and students have just improved their test -oriented ability.This kind of education is therefore only infertility, not aimed at the overall development of students.In the long run, the cultivation of the values of students will be ignored, the development of personality will be hindered, and the ability of creativity and independent thinking will undoubtedly be strangled.

Some people are worried about the new injustice of the Live Teaching Society.Some media followed up reports that there were more than a thousand students in a middle school, but the school only selected the best students from it, and finally formed only one or two live broadcast classes, and the remaining students recorded the broadcast class the next day.

Many schools that conduct live and output teaching content have also been criticized by some public opinion as the product of unfair education.In fact, in recent years, these schools have become more and more, and the scale is larger. Its common point is that it is aimed at pure pursuit of education rates, and often monopolizes local teachers, which has exacerbated the unbalance of distribution of educational resources.They are generally far away from the countryside and reduce the opportunities of rural students.

Objectively speaking, the live broadcast education alone obviously cannot completely solve the problem of uneven educational resources, because it only shares high -quality teachers through a technology tool, the supply of educational resources has not increased, and the problem of scarce rural teachers is difficult to alleviate.

However, at the same time, it is undeniable that the live broadcast screen really provides some students with opportunities to enjoy high -quality educational resources, so it cannot be ignored to promote the fairness of education fairness.Looking forward to the future, how the school will improve the curriculum interaction when using live teaching and realize personalized teaching, it may be worth exploring.

From the perspective of further amplification, behind China's injustice is not just a matter of imbalanced urban and rural development.Some scholars have concluded that it is also reflected in the unfairness of key school education and general school education, the unfair education of education and employment education, the unfair education of the students, the unfairness of men and women education, educators and suffering from men and women educationEducators' unfairness, knowledge education and quality education.How to optimize the distribution of resources and narrow these gaps to solve the problem of unfairness, so it is not easy, and the joint efforts of all sectors of society are needed.

Obviously, it may not be possible to change the fate of the students alone, but it at least let people see the possibility of new technologies to help education reform.In addition, it has a positive significance that has set off a discussion of Chinese society around education fairness.