Zhu Kaidi, a local member of the Hong Kong Legislative Council election, was eligible for the election director to cancel the representative of the countryside. Chief Executive Lin Zheng Yue'e stated that he would support the DQ, but it would not affect Zhu's Legislative Council.The institutionalists believe that Hong Kong's political red line has not changed.
Lin Zhengyue said that supporting the election director made DQ Zhu Kaidi decisions under the power of exercising the laws carefully and fulfilling his responsibilities. As for whether the law will be amended to list the red line of Hong Kong elections for elections, the Hong Kong Government will perform internal research.
According to the National People's Republic of China, Liang Meifen believes that the Hong Kong Government should consider amending the regulations of each election, including the District Council and Election Commission, stating that candidates cannot advocate Hong Kong independence and self -determination.She said that advocating Hong Kong independence and self -determination all violated the "Basic Law" under one country, two systems.She said that the Hong Kong Government's repairs allowed lower -level elections such as rural elections and district council elections, with clearer instructions and reducing blurred areas.At the end of next year, the Hong Kong District Council will conduct a general election, involving more than 400 constituencies. For example, the election director will judge the qualifications of each candidate one by one, and the workload and responsibility of frontline personnel will be too large.
Zhu Kaidi was dissatisfied with Lin Zheng's response, and even questioned whether the election director of the country's representative election was the same as the election director of the Legislative Council election. He had the same power to inquire about the political stance of candidates.
He also said that according to the court of the National Party's convener Chen Haotian's election, the court's judgment was not applied to the countryside elections. Because the verdict is about the legislature election, and the rural election has its legislative foundation and original intention. Therefore, the power of the election director should not beAct.
Tian Beichen, the convener of the real government round table, who is also a representative of the Hong Kong District People's Congress, believes that Zhu Kaidi is vague when responding to the election director's question, and did not completely show that he opposed the position of the Hong Kong independence as an option.Participate in the 2020 Legislative Council election.
However, he did not support the Legislative Council to condemn the proposal to Zhu Kaidi, because the number of tickets in the system is still insufficient (two -thirds of the support can be passed), and once he successfully condemned, he would have to carry out a supplementary election.
Mao Mengjing, the convener of the Democratic Conference, questioned that Lin Zheng deliberately left his tail. The DQ Zhu Kaidi incident may be cited by the Hong Kong government to pave the way for other elections. Relevant political review will continue to be used.
