Zhu Kaidi, a Hong Kong Pan -civilian member who supports democratic self -determination, faces pressure because he was accused of hidden support for Hong Kong independence.(AFP)
The 24 Democratic Legislative Council members in Hong Kong issued a joint statement that Zhu Kaidi, a member of the Local Legislative Council, was accused of supporting Hong Kong independence by the Hong Kong government as a vague support.Express extreme anger and strongest condemnation.
Zhu Kaidi, a member of the Hong Kong Local School Legislative Council, was referred to by the Hong Kong Government as a hidden support for Hong Kong independence and was rejected to participate in the country's representative elections. Now, he is also facing the pressure of impeachment in the Legislative Yuan to win the qualifications of members of the Legislative Yuan.To this end, the people of Pan people have strong voices, and democratic democracy, which is concerned about incorrect politics, may be reviewed and copied in future elections.
In this regard, the 24 Democratic Legislative Council members of Hong Kong issued a joint statement yesterday to express extremely angry and stronger condemnation in this way. Criticizing the practice of the Hong Kong government will deepen the international community. It is believed that Hong Kong has been severely harmed, and the one country, two systems gradually disappear.
Democratic members described in the statement that the authorities decided to refuse Zhu Kaidi for the election. It was obviously sweeping the law aside, preceding with the will of the chief, and the red line at will, extremely ridiculous.
The statement criticized that the Hong Kong government's move clearly stated that similar political censorship will continue to be universal in the next Legislative Council election, and it must be extended to the district council election next year.Its heart can be stunned.
The statement pointed out that the election director has no right to inquire about the political concept of the candidate
The statement emphasizes that 104 Basic Law does not include representatives of rural suburbs. The director of the election has no right to inquire about the political philosophy of the candidate. The behavior is equivalent to the ideological police.
Mao Mengjing, the convener of the Democratic Conference, said that Li Huiqiong, the chairman of the Legislative Council's Internal Affairs Committee, proposed to discuss the incident at the meeting on Friday and conduct a break debate at the conference.In addition, Panmin will also try to hold public hearing at the Political Affairs Committee to let citizens and civil society express their views on the incident.
Zhu Kaidi criticized that when he answered the election director question, he did not avoid whether to support Hong Kong independence. In 2016, he signed a statement that supports Hong Kong independence as a promising future for Hong Kong people.The Hong Kong independence option was confirmed.
He said: I think other people express their opinions peacefully by the "Basic Law" guarantee, but I have not advocated Hong Kong independence, but I was interpreted as I do not support the "Basic Law"!
He described that the Hong Kong Government has now extended the red line infinitely, and believes that there is no problem against Hong Kong independence, so that everyone is forced to be an ideological police officer.
However, Li Huiqiong, the chairman of the largest party and civilian federation and the Legislative Council of the largest party and civilian federation in Hong Kong, believes that because Zhu Kaidi did not explicitly oppose self -determination, she respected and supported the election director.Li Huiqiong also believes that the matter has nothing to do with freedom of speech.
Li Huiqiong admits that the establishment faction will not rule out that he will be held accountable and proposes to win the qualifications of MPs Zhu Kaidi, but it has not been discussed at this stage.She emphasized that the establishment faction originally believed that the current Legislative Council's term of office was more than a year, and hoped to conduct relatively harmoniously, but new development has occurred, so it is necessary to discuss it again.
She said: Until now, no lawmakers told me to impeach Zhu Kaidi.Our institutional factions will meet regularly to discuss all new progress, so we cannot rule out any possibilities.
According to the rules of the council, members of the Legislative Council can disqualify the qualifications of members, including quoting Article 79 (7) of the "Basic Law", referring to the oaths that a member of the lawmakers do not inspect or violate Article 104 of the "Basic Law".It condemns, but the bill must be obtained by the three -pointer of the members of the meeting to pass.
